Thursday, March 10, 2011

Tim Palwenty in New Hampshire Today


MANCHESTER, NH: Granite Oath PAC has confirmed that on Thursday, March 10th, 2011, former Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty will participate in the second of its 2011 Presidential Series house parties, beginning at 5:30pm.
The event will be held at the home of PAC Chairman and former candidate for U.S. Senate Ovide Lamontagne and his wife Bettie, and will be open to the media.

Details
Thursday, March 10th, 2011
Granite Oath PAC Event with Governor Tim Pawlenty
Home of Ovide and Bettie Lamontagne
172 Young Street
Manchester, NH 03103

This will be the second in a series of events that Granite Oath PAC seeks to hold with the major prospective Republican candidates for President in New Hampshire’s upcoming First in the Nation primary. The first event was held with former U.S. Senator Rick Santorum on January 11th, with an overflow crowd of over 150 activists attending from throughout New Hampshire.

Wednesday, March 9, 2011

President Barack Obama's Boston Visit - Video and Transcripts

President Barack Obama was in Boston yesterday, where he talked about the future of education in America and attended a $5,000 dollar a plate fundraiser at the Museum of Fine Arts.

"As a nation, we have a moral and economic imperative to give every child the chance to succeed," Obama said during his visit to TechBoston Academy in Dorchester.

The MFA fundraiser was expected to raise more than $1 million for the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, according to the Boston Globe.



Transcript of President Obama's education speech in Boston:

The White House
Office of the Press Secretary

Remarks by the President on Winning the Future in Education in Boston, Massachusetts

TechBoston Academy
Boston, Massachusetts
 
     THE PRESIDENT:  Hey!  (Applause.)  Hello, TechBoston!  (Applause.)  Thank you.  Thank you so much.  Thank you, everybody.  Thank you, everybody.  Everybody please have a seat.  Everybody please have a seat.
 
We are thrilled to see especially the students here today.  (Applause.)  I am grateful for the presence of a few other outstanding leaders.  First of all, the great mayor of Boston Tom Menino is in the house.  There he is over there.  (Applause.)  Lieutenant Governor Tim Murray is here.  Where’s Tim?  (Applause.)  Tim, good to see you.  The outstanding Secretary of Education Arne Duncan is in the house.  (Applause.)  
 
To all of you who are contributing to the outstanding education of these young people, I could not be prouder to be here.  It is wonderful to be back in Massachusetts.  Some of you may know I spent some time in school here myself.  I was much younger.  I had no gray hair.  (Laughter.)  There were definitely no SmartBoards back then.  (Laughter.)  The most exciting new technology was an electric pencil sharpener.  (Laughter.)  So times have changed.  You remember those?  (Laughter.)  Do you know what pencils are?  Do you guys use pencils?
 
I am so grateful to have Melinda Gates joining us here today.  Of course, we all know Melinda’s husband Bill, who couldn’t hack it at school here, dropped out.  (Laughter.)  Then he started a modest -- modestly successful computer company.  That was a joke, guys.  (Laughter.)  Bill Gates actually created a really big company.  (Laughter.)  But Melinda is a force in her own right -- she is one of the world’s most generous but also effective philanthropists, successful businesswoman, and most important for today, she has been an extraordinary leader when it comes to education reform.  Microsoft and the Gates Foundation have been partners with TechBoston since it got started, and we are very grateful for their support.  Proud of them.  (Applause.)  
 
Melinda is absolutely right, by the way.  One of the things that I’ve benefited from in this effort to make sure our schools are working for every young person is my Secretary of Education.  Some of you might have known that Arne used to play professional basketball in Australia.  He was on the Harvard basketball team; was a star there.  Just the other week, he was in a celebrity basketball tournament where he was outscored by Justin Bieber.  (Laughter.)  I’m just saying.  (Laughter.)  Justin is, like, about 5’2” -- (laughter) -- so please give him a hard time for that if you get a chance.  
 
Now, we’re in the middle of what we’re calling Education Month at the White House, and I wanted to come to TechBoston so that the rest of America can see how it’s done.  You guys are a model for what’s happening all across the country.  (Applause.)  And obviously at the helm is Mary Skipper, who is doing unbelievable work.  (Applause.)  
 
AUDIENCE MEMBER:  We love you, Skip!
 
THE PRESIDENT:  Love you, Skip!  (Laughter.)  But also the extraordinarily talented teaching staff that is working here.  I had a chance to meet a couple of the teachers, and you could just tell that they are passionate about the work that they do.  So they deserve a huge round of applause.  (Applause.)  
 
Every day, TechBoston is proving that no matter who you are, or what you look like, or where you come from, every child can learn.  Every child can succeed.  And every child deserves that chance.  
 
Getting the best possible education has never been more important than it is right now.  And that’s because in today’s world, a good job requires a good education.  I travel all across the country, I go into factories, I go into companies.  And it doesn’t matter where you are working -- if you do not have a good education you are not going to be able to succeed.  And that includes being on the factory floor these days, because most of the equipment is highly technical.
 
Over the next 10 years, nearly half of all new jobs will require a level of education beyond a high school degree.  Which means, obviously, first of all, you can’t drop out of TechBoston.  That’s not allowed.  All right?  You can’t even think about dropping out.  (Applause.)  But -- can’t even think about it.  But even after you graduate, you’re going to need some additional education.  And I know that TechBoston is doing an outstanding job of making sure that every student is prepared to go to college.  
 
Unfortunately, the reality is too many students are not prepared across our country.  Too many leave school without the skills they need to get a job that pays.  Today, as many as a quarter of American students are not finishing high school -- a quarter.  The quality of our math and science education lags behind many other nations.  And America has fallen to ninth in the proportion of young people with a college degree.  We used to be number one, and we’re now number nine.  That’s not acceptable.  
 
The most effective way to create jobs in this country is to change those statistics.  There’s no better economic policy than one that produces more graduates with the skills they need to succeed -- to start their own businesses, to create their own Microsoft, to create new industries.  And that’s why reforming education is the responsibility of every single American -– every parent, every teacher, every business leader, every public official, and yes, every student.  
 
Now, it used to be that we weren’t sure how to turn around failing schools.  We weren’t sure what worked to help struggling students.  There were some folks in Washington who said all it took was more money, and if we just poured more money into the school everything would better.  Then there were others who said, no, you just got to blow up these schools, they can’t work.  A lot of people thought we should just give up on places like Dorchester, and they assume that some kids just can’t learn, or they’ve got too many disadvantages.  There are always some excuses for why our young people couldn’t succeed.  
 
But after awhile, parents and teachers and education reformers started to realize that maybe Washington didn’t have all the answers.  And I can promise you after being there for a few years, they’re on to something there.  (Laughter.)  People started realizing that what’s needed is not either/or, it’s not either more money or more reform, it’s both/and -- both more money and more reform.  That’s what’s needed.  (Applause.)
 
What’s needed is higher standards and higher expectations; more time in the classroom and greater focus on subjects like math and science.  What’s needed are outstanding teachers and leaders like Skip who get more flexibility.  I just like that name.  I’m going call you Skip now.  (Laughter and applause.)  But education leaders who get more flexibility in exchange for more accountability.
 
And all those ingredients are present here at TechBoston.  The students here, they get their own laptop when they walk through the door.  That costs money, but it opens up a window for learning.  You’re required to take four years of math, science and technology classes -- classes like web development and entrepreneurship and even forensic science.  I didn’t even know what forensic science was in high school.  (Laughter.)  I’m not sure I do now.  (Laughter.)  But that’s part of the requirement that makes this school outstanding.
 
The school days are longer.  Classes are 60 minutes so that young people have time to actually focus and absorb the information that’s being provided.  And many students go to school in July and August.  I usually don’t get much applause from students when I point that out.  (Laughter.)  Because this is a pilot school, Mary had the ability to hire her own staff, and the teachers here are offered training and constant support.          
 
So those are the ingredients, and the results have been powerful.  The students here come from some tough neighborhoods -- am I right?  Yes.  And yet the graduation rate is almost 20 points higher than the rest of the city -- 20 points higher.  (Applause.)  Ninety-four percent of the most recent graduating class went to college.  Eighty-five percent of those students were the first in their family to do so.  (Applause.)  Your math and science scores are consistently higher than other Boston schools, and the attendance rate here is 94 percent.
 
So it’s working.  What’s happening here is working.  We know what works.  What’s required, then, to get results from any school is no longer a mystery.  And that means there can’t be any more excuses -- from anybody.  As a nation, we have a moral and economic imperative to give every child the chance to succeed.  And that’s why I set a goal when I took office, that by the end of the decade, America will once again have the highest proportion of college graduates in the world.  We will be number one again.  (Applause.)
 
Now, to achieve this goal, everybody is going to need to do their part.  We need the help of philanthropists like Melinda Gates.  We’ll need the help of the businesses that are partnering with TechBoston.  We need citizens and parents to get involved, because nothing we do in school with make much of a difference unless we instill in our kids the self-confidence and the self-discipline and the work ethic that are at the heart of success not just in school but in life.
 
So some of you may have come from a tough neighborhood, but you’ve got some parents at home, you’ve got somebody at home who’s nagging you and staying on top of you and saying you can succeed.  And I’m assuming somebody who’s also turning off the TV set once in a while and saying, put away the video games and do your homework.  That has to be a critical ingredient in success.  
 
We need to recognize that the true path to reform has to involve partnerships between teachers and school administrators and communities.  And we’ll need a national education policy that tries to figure out how do we replicate success stories like TechBoston all across the country.  
 
So that’s what Arne Duncan’s job is, and that’s what he’s been doing so well over the last few years.  Instead of pouring money into a broken system, under Arne’s leadership, what we’ve done is we’ve launched a competition.  We call it Race to the Top.  (Applause.)  We call it Race to the Top, and it’s basically a challenge to states and school districts, prove to us that you’re serious about reform.  We’ve said to all 50 states, if you show us the most innovative plans for improving teacher quality and improving student achievement, then we’ll show you the money.  And for less than 1 percent of what America spends on education each year, Race to the Top has led over 40 states to raise their standards for teaching and learning -- standards, by the way, that were developed not in Washington but by Republican and Democratic governors all across the country.  
 
So at the grassroots level, at the state level, standards were developed.  And we said, show us how you’re going to meet these standards.  The more innovative you are, the more money you can get for your schools.   And that’s the kind of bottom-up approach that we need to follow.  This year we’re going to have to work with Congress to fix No Child Left Behind, and we’re going to have to replace it with a law that does a better job focusing on responsibility and reform and, most of all, results.  (Applause.)
 
We’re also trying to give school districts more flexibility to open charter schools and pilot schools like TechBoston, so that they have the flexibility, the autonomy, to do what’s best for students.  We’re working to make sure every school has a 21st-century curriculum like you do.  And in the same way that we invested in the science and research that led to the breakthroughs like the Internet, I’m calling for investments in educational technology that will help create digital tutors that are as effective as personal tutors, and educational software that’s as compelling as the best video game.  I want you guys to be stuck on a video game that’s teaching you something other than just blowing something up.  (Applause.)
 
And because we know that the single most important factor in a student’s success after their parent is the person standing at the front of the classroom, we are looking to make teaching one of the most honored professions in our society.  (Applause.)  In South Korea, teachers are known as “nation builders.”  That’s what they’re -- that’s how they’re described.  Here in America, it’s time we treated the people who educate our children with the same level of respect.  (Applause.)  We’ve got to lift up teachers.  We’ve got to reward good teachers.  First, we also have to stop making excuses for bad teachers.  We’re also working to give educators the support and the preparation that they need, and I know that some of the teachers here have benefited from our investment in these programs, such as the teacher preparation partnership you have with the Boston Teachers Residency and with UMass Boston.  
 
And with so many baby boomers retiring from teaching over the next few years, we intend to recruit and prepare a new generation of teachers, including 100,000 new math and science teachers over the next decade.  And I hope that some of you will end up going into the teaching profession and pass on all the knowledge that you’ve gotten here at TechBoston.  (Applause.)
 
Now, I’ve talked about how much we can improve student achievement through various reforms -- setting higher standards, higher expectations; giving schools and teachers more flexibility in exchange for greater accountability.  But it’s also true that fixing our schools will cost some money.  Recruiting and rewarding the best teachers costs money.  Making it possible for families to send their kids to college costs money.  Making sure that some of the state-of-the-art equipment that all of you are working on when I walked into Mr. Louis’s classroom today, that costs money.  
 
Making these investments in education is going to be absolutely critical, but it’s tough to do after decades of deficits.  I understand that.  For too long, the government has been spending more money than it’s been taking in.  So we’re going to have to get serious about cutting whatever spending we don’t need, which means I’ve already called for a five-year freeze in our annual domestic budget.  That’s a freeze that would cut the deficit by more than $400 billion over the next decade, and it would bring such spending to a lower share of our economy than it’s been in 50 years.  And I’ve proposed cutting or eliminating more than 200 federal programs that aren’t working as well as they should.  We’re freezing the salaries of hardworking civil servants for two years.  And I’m willing to do more to get our deficits under control.  And that’s why the White House is leading bipartisan meetings with members of Congress, because we need to come up with a budget that forces government to live within its means.
 
But -- and I want everybody to pay attention -- even as we find ways to cut spending, we cannot cut back on job-creating investments like education.  We cannot cut back on the very investments that will help our economy grow and our nation compete and make sure that these young people succeed.  (Applause.)  There’s nothing responsible about that.  There’s nothing responsible about cutting back on our investment in these young people.
 
I mean, think about what happens in your own family.  If you have a family member that loses a job or you have an illness in the family and you’ve got to cut back, where do you start?  You maybe give up a vacation.  You go out to eat less often.  Maybe you don’t buy that new coat you thought was sharp, or the new car that you thought you needed.  But the last thing you do is give up saving on your child’s education, because you know that’s the key to that child’s success in life.  
 
Well, what’s true for a family has to be true for the larger American family.  A budget that sacrifices our commitment to education is a budget that sacrifices our country’s future.  It is a budget that sacrifices our children’s future, and I will not let it happen.  (Applause.)  I will not let it happen.  We’re not going to give up on any school in America or any child in America.  
 
We can’t forget that every year, schools like TechBoston have to hold a lottery, because there just aren’t enough spaces for all the students who want to go here.  The reason they want to go here is because they know that if they go to some of the other schools in the area, they won’t do as well.  They know that they might drop out.  They might not get the same reinforcement that they need.  There might not be that same culture of excellence and performance.  That means they may not go to college, and they know they may not succeed.  
 
All of that shouldn’t depend on a lottery.  That can’t be the system of education we settle for in America.  No child’s chance in life should be determined by the luck of a lottery.  Not in this country.  This is a place where everyone gets the chance to succeed, where everybody should have a chance to make it.  The motto of this school is, “We rise and fall together.”  Well, that is true for America as well.  (Applause.)  That’s true for America as well.
 
If we want to prosper in the 21st century, and if we want to keep the American Dream alive in our time, then we’re going to rise together.  We’ve all got to come together.  We’ve got to give our children the same world-class education that you are getting right here at TechBoston.  And as long as I am President, that’s what I’m going to be fighting for right alongside you.  
 
Thank you so much, everybody.  (Applause.)  God bless you.  God bless the United States of America.

Monday, March 7, 2011

Mitt Romney Fact Check: U.S. employers pay highest taxes in the world

"Our employers pay the highest taxes in the world, tied with Japan," Mitt Romney said during a March 6, 2011 speech in New Hampshire. That's quite a statistic, but is it true?


It turns out that the Pulitzer Prize winning website PolitiFact.com has examined this very question before. In November of 2010, then Senator-elect Pat Toomey made a similar statement on NBC's "Meet the Press", albeit using slightly different words. "We should be lowering corporate tax rates because we have the highest in the world right now," he claimed. PolitiFact rated Toomey's statement to be Partly True, mostly based on his very specific use of the phrase "corporate tax rates".

The truthiness of Toomey's statistic actually varies depending on the kind of measurement you use. Among the 32 nations that form the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), the U.S. does have the highest statutory tax rate. However, statutory tax rates do not reflect what companies actually pay once bookkeepers go to work factoring in deductions and loopholes. That's why the statutory tax rate in the U.S. - 39.21% in 2010 - is far higher than the effective tax rate of 27.6%. Simply put, the U.S. does not rank #1 in the world when it comes to effective tax rates - the amount of taxes companies actually pay. 

Unlike Toomey, Mitt Romney specifically claimed that U.S. employers pay the world's highest taxes. He's way off. World Bank statistics show that the nation's effective tax rate of 27.6% is relatively low compared to that of nations like Palau (66%) or the Democratic Republic of Congo (58.9%).

Coming from the current favorite to win New Hampshire's first-in-the-nation Republican presidential primary in 2012, Romney's comments were obviously aimed at bringing President Barack Obama down a notch. In reality, he and the president actually agree on this particular issue.

"Over the years, a parade of lobbyists has rigged the tax code to benefit particular companies and industries," Obama said during his 2011 State of the Union Address. "Those with accountants or lawyers to work the system can end up paying no taxes at all. But all the rest are hit with one of the highest corporate tax rates in the world. It makes no sense, and it has to change."

Compare that to the following quote from Mitt Romney's March 6th speech in New Hampshire:

"Our employers pay the highest taxes in the world, tied with Japan. Even France and Italy have lower taxes than we do! And it’s our small companies that are particularly hard hit. We have to cut their taxes. At the same time, we need to say no to the corporate loopholes and special deals that reward influence and punish productivity."


A little bipartisan consensus as the early stages of the 2012 election get underway!


Article ©2011 David Anderson for New Hampshire Primary 2012. 


File:January 2008 Mitt Romney Campaign Rally.jpg

Photo of Mitt Romney from 2008 by Brian Rawson-Ketchum

Iowa Faith & Freedom Coalition Spring Kick-Off

A handful of GOP presidential hopefuls will share the same stage today at the Iowa Faith & Freedom Coalition Spring Kick-Off Event in Waukee. Five potential presidential candidates will speak at the event - Herman Cain, Newt Gingrich, Tim Pawlenty, Buddy Roemer and Rick Santorum. You can watch the event live on C-Span starting at 8:00 PM.

The national Faith & Freedom Coalition has also invited a number of potential Republican presidential candidates to Washington, D.C. for its Conference & Strategy Briefing on June 2-4. Invited speakers include Michele Bachmann, Newt Gingrich, Sarah Palin, and Marc Rubio.

Sunday, March 6, 2011

Mitt Romney's New Hampshire Speech - Video and Transcript

Yesterday, during his first public appearance in New Hampshire of 2011, Mitt Romney called for a "new president" and took the existing one to task on issues ranging from health care to jobs. The comments came as Romney addressed the Carrol County Republican Committee's Lincoln-Reagan Dinner. 


Video:


Watch live streaming video from freestrongamerica at livestream.com


freestrongamerica on livestream.com. Broadcast Live Free


Transcript:
Good to be among so many friends.
Good to be in Carroll County, even in the winter. I didn’t know just how cold it could get in Carroll County until Ann and I bought our home on Lake Winnipesaukee. After the closing, I wanted to get a look at what the place looked like from the water. Now it was winter and the lake was frozen, but I didn’t know if the ice was strong enough to hold my weight. So I got a ladder from the garage and pushed it out on the ice ahead of me, to spread my weight. As I was gingerly inching my way along, about 100 yards from the shore, I looked up as a truck drove by. The guy was laughing.
So yeah, New Hampshire gets cold in the winter. But the state is known for a lot more than that. The mountains and lakes are among the most beautiful in the world. The White Mountains are New England’s Alps.  
There’s something else the state is known for. It’s a New Hampshire original. And that is history.
Every four years, the men and women who want to lead this nation come to New Hampshire. And New Hampshire decides how they measure up. There’s no committee of big wigs, it’s decided by hundreds of thousands of honest, dedicated New Hampshire voters. 
Every candidate is treated the same, no matter how important they may think they are. It doesn’t matter if they land on Air Force One or show up in their Chevy.  
It can be a humbling experience. And me, well I made more than my share of gaffes here—as my sons never fail to remind me.  But it was also exhilarating. The weather may have been cold, but the people are warm--we made friends here for a lifetime. We liked New Hampshire so much, we may just decide to play a double header.
There’s a lot at stake in what New Hampshire will decide.
Charles Krauthammer wrote that during the 1990’s, Americans seemed to take a “holiday from history.” The economy was strong and with the Cold War over, the world appeared to be pretty well settled. But history has come back now, with a vengeance.
The President promised that his unique personal background would give him special insights into foreign policy. What we have seen instead is a President that is unprepared and unequal to the task of leading the free world. 
He supported Honduras’ Marxist President, but puts off pro-American Colombia. At the United Nations, he condemns Israel, but ignores Hamas’ thousands of devastating rockets. His proposed engagement with Iran and North Korea that won him the Nobel Prize—how has that worked out? Iran is arming Hamas and Hezbollah and rushing toward nuclear weapons. North Korea tested nukes, launched missiles, sunk a ship, and shelled a South Korean island.In the Middle East, the President was silent last year when dissenters took to the streets to challenge Iran’s fanatical ayatollahs. And now, with the entire Middle East in turmoil, he and his administration were caught off guard. The President and his team look like deer in the headlights.  Instead of leading the world, the President has been tiptoeing behind the Europeans. Newsweek magazine this week said that he hasn’t just lost his foreign policy map for the Middle East—he doesn’t even have one. This is the first time in a quarter of a century that America has had no discernible foreign policy. Not since the days of Jimmy Carter have we had such a foreign policy vacuum in Washington. And it could not have come at a worse time.
Here at home, the President points out that he inherited an economic crisis. He did. And he promptly made it worse. He borrowed nearly a trillion dollars and promised that it would keep unemployment below 8%--it blew past that level and hasn’t looked back since. 

Our current high unemployment isn’t just a statistic. It is 14 million Americans out of work. It’s kids who can’t go to college, it’s people in the prime of their life who wonder if they will ever find a good paying job again, it’s marriages that crack under the strain. This is not just a policy problem, it is a moral tragedy. The President and his Administration are failing our fellow Americans in one of their fundamental responsibilities.
The President should have learned a lesson from New Hampshire. Anyone who sees the row after row of textile mill buildings in Manchester knows that this state has experienced economic crisis. New Hampshire’s answer was to hold down taxes and red tape, to balance its budget, to keep government efficient, and to keep it small. And the end result was that the state became a capital of innovation and small business. 
Today, those Manchester mills are teeming with activity. New Hampshire is home to cutting-edge companies in military technology, healthcare, electronics, energy, just to name a few—it is a hotbed of entrepreneurs. 
Senator Obama campaigned hard in New Hampshire but he apparently didn’t like what he saw. He certainly didn’t learn from it. Instead of lowering taxes, he raised them. He wrapped businesses in red tape, he grew government, he borrowed trillions of dollars, and he made it clear that he doesn’t like business people very much. 
He created a deeper recession, and delayed the recovery. The consequence is soaring numbers of Americans enduring unemployment, foreclosures and bankruptcies. This is the Obama Misery Index, and it is at a record high. It’s going to take more than new rhetoric to put Americans back to work—it’s going to take a new president. 
As you know, I spent my career in the private sector. I know how jobs are created and how jobs are lost. I have helped guide more than one enterprise that was in crisis. And I learned that there are three rules of every successful turnaround: focus, focus, focus. Turnarounds work when the leader focuses on what’s most important. President Obama did just the opposite: he delegated the jobs crisis to Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid and he went to work on his own liberal priorities, like cap and trade and government-run healthcare. The next president must focus on what’s most important: getting Americans back to work.  
Let me mention a few of the things the next president must do to restore our economy and create jobs. I’ll start with taxes. Our employers pay the highest taxes in the world, tied with Japan. Even France and Italy have lower taxes than we do! And it’s our small companies that are particularly hard hit. We have to cut their taxes. At the same time, we need to say no to the corporate loopholes and special deals that reward influence and punish productivity.
And we need to stop penalizing companies that want to invest in America. Right now, we tax companies who make money overseas if they want to bring it home, but we don’t tax them if they keep their money abroad. That makes no sense at all. We want that money here, invested in new factories, new equipment, and new jobs. 
How much money do American companies store overseas that’s waiting to come back? Estimates range as high as one trillion dollars. Bringing a trillion dollars back to the United States will create hundreds of thousands--or even millions of good, permanent, private sector jobs.
The next president is also going to have clean up the red tape, bureaucracy and tax mess that this Administration has left behind. It is simply choking job creation. Now I like President Obama, but he doesn’t have a clue how jobs are created. He doesn’t know what goes through an entrepreneur’s mind when she borrows and scrapes to get the money to start a new company-- because he’s never done it himself. He doesn’t know how many businesses fail because of governments’ heavy handed, outmoded regulations and taxes, because he’s never worked in one himself. And when he put together his cabinet, he nearly excluded anyone who had ever worked in a real business.
It shouldn’t be a surprise, then, that even when he tries to help, he sometimes makes things worse. I visited the Amoskeag business incubator in Manchester a few weeks ago. One entrepreneur said that it’s become almost impossible to find investment capital because now that the Obama administration is playing venture capitalist, everyone wants a government guarantee before they will invest. 
You see, when the government gets into a market, instead of helping the market, it hurts it, by scaring the private sector away. Government should make the rules, but it shouldn’t be one of the players. 
I have to tell you how impressed I was with those New Hampshire entrepreneurs at the incubator, by the way. They were pioneering everything from solar energy, to military acoustics, to consumer products. They and people like them are who create the jobs that put people back to work. And when government gets in their way or taxes away their success, government kills jobs. That’s what’s happening, and that’s one reason so many people are still out of work. 
Now let’s talk a moment about something else that keeps employers and entrepreneurs from creating jobs. And that’s the growing fear about the federal deficit and the federal debt. They worry that our government’s spending binge will mean higher taxes, higher interest rates, and a much weaker dollar. People don’t invest for the long term if the long term looks sick. To see more good jobs, we need to see fiscal responsibility in Washington.
One way to do that would be to establish a ceiling on federal spending at a fixed percent of the GDP—historically, that number has ranged between 18% and 20%. Today, Washington is spending close to 25%. A spending limit would mean that the politicians would have to cut their free-spending ways.
Republicans are fighting to do just that by cutting discretionary spending. That’s important and it’s a good start. But it’s just baby steps, because discretionary spending is about 20% of the budget. The military is another 20%, and given what’s happening in the world, we should not reduce our commitment to national security. In particular, we should not cut the number of our men and women in uniform!
So that leaves 60%--the lion’s share. And 60% is what  government spends on entitlements and interest—Social Security, Medicaid, Medicare, and the new entitlement, Obamacare.  Obamacare has to be repealed and the other programs have to be made sustainable. Last year in my book, I described how I would do just that. Here’s the bottom line: the longer we delay, the worse things will get.  If we re-shape each of these programs today, and repeal Obamacare, we can honor our promises to seniors, and protect our economy as well. 
When President Obama was elected, the economy was in crisis. And in crisis, he turned to a model in which he really believes. It wasn’t the New Hampshire model. No, he turned to Europe. Like the Europeans, he grew the government, he racked up bigger deficits, he pushed cap and trade, he fought to impose unions on America’s workers, and he created over a hundred new boards, agencies and commissions and reams of new regulations. 
At every turn, he and his fellow liberals sought to seize more power for Washington. And in that cause, nothing was more misguided and egregious than Obamacare! 
Living in New Hampshire, you’ve heard of our healthcare program next door in Massachusetts. You may have noticed that the President and his people spend more time talking about me and Massachusetts healthcare than Entertainment Tonight spends talking about Charlie Sheen.
Our approach was a state plan intended to address problems that were in many ways unique to Massachusetts.  What we did was what the Constitution intended for states to do—we were one of the laboratories of democracy. 
Our experiment wasn’t perfect—some things worked, some didn’t, and some things I’d change. One thing I would never do is to usurp the constitutional power of states with a one-size-fits-all federal takeover. 
I would repeal Obamacare, if I were ever in a position to do so.  My experience has taught me that states are where healthcare programs for the uninsured should be crafted, just as the Constitution provides. Obamacare is bad law, bad policy, and it is bad for America’s families.
The federal government isn’t the answer for running healthcare any more than it’s the answer for running Amtrak or the Post Office. An economy run by the federal government doesn’t work for Europe and it won’t work here. 
The right answer is not to believe in European solutions. The right answer is to believe in America—to believe in freedom, free enterprise, capitalism, limited government, federalism—and to believe in the constitution, as it was written and intended by the founders.
My father never graduated from college. He apprenticed, as a lath and plaster carpenter, and he was darn good at it. He learned how to put a handful of nails in his mouth and spit them out, point forward. On his honeymoon, he and Mom drove across the country. Dad sold aluminum paint along the way, to pay for gas and hotels.
Dad always believed in America; and in that America, a lath and plaster man could work his way up to running a little car company called American Motors and end up Governor of a state where he had once sold aluminum paint.
For my Dad, America was the land of opportunity, where the circumstances of birth are no barrier to achieving ones dreams. In Dad’s America, small business and entrepreneurs were encouraged, and respected.
The spirit of enterprise, innovation, pioneering and derring-do propelled our standard of living and economy past every other nation on earth.
I refuse to believe that America is just another place on the map with a flag. We stand for freedom and opportunity and hope.
We didn’t originate the concept of liberty, but our Founding Fathers built it into a political system that set an example for the world. And from the bloodied sands of Omaha beach to the treacherous valleys of the Hindu Kush, we have battled with unmatched courage and determination, not to conquer territory, but to give others the chance to experience the liberty that is humanity’s destiny.
Given all that America has done to lift others from poverty, given the millions of afflicted we have helped to heal and comfort, and given the hundreds of thousands of lives of America’s sons and daughters that have been, and are today, sacrificed to defend freedom, I will not apologize for America!
I don’t apologize for America because I believe in America! 
These last two years have not been the best of times. But while we’ve lost a couple of years, we have not lost our way. The principles that made us a great nation and leader of the world have not lost their meaning. They never will. The society that fosters opportunity and free enterprise, and puts prosperity in the reach of all, still exists. Treasuring it and safeguarding it is fundamentally what conservatism is all about. 
We sing for God to bless America. He already has, he does now and thanks to the greatness of the American people and the principles that guide us, he will do so for generations to come. 
Believe in America. Our freedom depends on it.
Thank you.