Climate change was on the agenda as U.S. President Barack
Obama visited Australia today, just eleven days before the start of the next United Nations
Climate Change Conference in Durban, South Africa.
President Obama mentioned climate change during his
speech
before the Australian Parliament this morning:
And we need growth that is sustainable. This includes
the clean energy that creates green jobs and combats climate change, which
cannot be denied. We see it in the stronger fires, the devastating
floods, the Pacific islands confronting rising seas. And as countries with
large carbon footprints, the United States and Australia have a special
responsibility to lead.
Every nation will contribute to the solution in its own way
-- and I know this issue is not without controversy, in both our
countries. But what we can do -- and what we are doing -- is to work
together to make unprecedented investments in clean energy, to increase energy
efficiency, and to meet the commitments we made at Copenhagen and Cancun.
We can do this, and we will.
He also responded to a reporter's question about U.S. climate policy
during a
press conference with Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard:
Mark Riley - 7 News, Australia: Mr. President, I wanted
to ask you about the other rising giant of our region -- India -- and the Prime
Minister might like to add some comments. How significant is it for the
U.S. that Australia is now considering selling uranium to India? And could you
clear up for us what influence or encouragement your administration gave
Australia as it made that decision? And also, the decision is so India
can produce clean energy. In that regard, you're aware that our
Parliament has passed a new bill, pricing carbon -- a carbon tax, if you
like. But we're intrigued about where America is going on this issue.
And countries like Australia don’t see a carbon trading
system in the world working unless America is a big part of it. Can you
tell us, is it your wish that American will have an emissions trading scheme
across the nation within the next five years or so? How heavily do you
want to see America involved in an emissions trading scheme globally, or has
this become too politically hard for you?
Barack Obama: Well, first of all, with respect to
India, we have not had any influence, I suspect, on Australia’s decision to
explore what its relationship in terms of the peaceful use of nuclear energy in
India might be. I suspect that you’ve got some pretty smart government
officials here who figured out that India is a big player, and that the
Australia-India relationship is one that should be cultivated. So I don’t
think Julia or anybody else needs my advice in figuring that out. This is
part of your neighborhood, and you are going to make bilateral decisions about
how to move forward.
I think without wading into the details, the discussions
that are currently taking place here in Australia around that relationship and
the nuclear issue with India are ones that are compatible with international
law, compatible with decisions that were made in the NPT. And I will
watch with interest what’s determined. But this is not something between
the United States and Australia; this is something between India and Australia.
With respect to carbon emissions, I share the view of your
Prime Minister and most scientists in the world that climate change is a real
problem and that human activity is contributing to it, and that we all have a
responsibility to find ways to reduce our carbon emissions.
Each country is trying to figure out how to do that most
effectively. Here in Australia, under the leadership of the Prime
Minister, you’ve moved forward with a bold strategy. In the United
States, although we haven’t passed what we call a cap-and-trade system, an
exchange, what we have done is, for example, taken steps to double fuel
efficiency standard on cars, which will have an enormous impact on removing
carbon from the atmosphere.
We’ve invested heavily in clean energy research. We
believe very strongly that we’ve improved efficiencies and a whole step range
of steps that we can meet and the commitments that we made in Copenhagen and
Cancun. And as we move forward over the next several years, my hope is,
is that the United States, as one of several countries with a big carbon
footprint, can find further ways to reduce our carbon emissions. I think
that’s good for the world. I actually think, over the long term, it’s
good for our economies as well, because it’s my strong belief that industries,
utilities, individual consumers -- we’re all going to have to adapt how we use
energy and how we think about carbon.
Now, another belief that I think the Prime Minister and I
share is that the advanced economies can’t do this alone. So part of our
insistence when we are in multilateral forum -- and I will continue to insist
on this when we go to Durban -- is that if we are taking a series of step, then
it’s important that emerging economies like China and India are also part of
the bargain. That doesn’t mean that they have to do exactly what we
do. We understand that in terms of per capita carbon emissions, they’ve
got a long way to go before they catch up to us. But it does mean that
they’ve got to take seriously their responsibilities as well.
And so, ultimately, what we want is a mechanism whereby all
countries are making an effort. And it’s going to be a tough slog,
particularly at a time when the economies are -- a lot of economies are still
struggling. But I think it’s actually one that, over the long term, can
be beneficial.