“American voters, both Democrats and Republicans, are
unified in backing prompt EPA action on the clean air rules,” said Ceres
president Mindy Lubber. “Regardless of affiliation, voters want a healthy
environment and an end to foot-dragging to upgrade dirty power plants.
Despite the rhetoric in Washington, clean air is not a partisan issue among
Americans, and Congress would do well to take notice.”
“Although some in Congress oppose these rules, the level of
support from Republican voters is surprisingly strong,” said Greg Strimple of
GS Strategy Group, a Republican pollster who jointly conducted the research.
“The research clearly demonstrates Republican voters are willing to support new
rules to reduce harmful emissions in order to improve public health.
Republicans like clean air, too.”
The poll, conducted Aug 31-Sept 7, gauged voters’ feelings
about two EPA clean air rules - the Cross State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR) and
the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards Rule (aka Utility MACT). The first rule
will require significant reductions in harmful power plant emissions, mostly
from coal-fired generators, that drift hundreds of miles downwind and across
state lines. The second rule will require power plants to curb toxic emissions
of mercury, lead, arsenic and acid gases by 2015. Many of the power
plants impacted by these rules are more than 50 years old.
These are the same two rules that Ceres and the University
of Massachusetts Political Economy Research Institute evaluated earlier this
year with respect to economic and job-creation benefits the rules would bring
across the United States:
http://www.ceres.org/resources/reports/new-jobs-cleaner-air.
http://www.ceres.org/resources/reports/new-jobs-cleaner-air.
Among the poll’s key findings:
- 88% of Democrats, 85% of Independents, and 58% of Republicans oppose Congress stopping the EPA from enacting new limits on air pollution from electric power plants.
- 67% of voters support the CSAPR and 77% of voters support the Toxics rule.
- 65% of voters surveyed are confident that the health and environmental benefits of air pollution standards outweigh the costs of complying with them.
- 79% of voters agree that the rules are important to enact for health reasons.
- 75% of voters believe a compelling reason to implement these rules is the boost to local economies and thousands of new jobs that will be created from investments in new technology.
Geoff Garin, president of Hart Research Associates, which
jointly conducted the poll observed, “Despite the vitriol coming from Capitol
Hill, the research shows that not only do voters see that it is an important
issue, the undeniable consensus is that they support these rules. The fear of
not having clean air is a clear-cut issue according to the voting public. And,
not only do voters overwhelmingly support the EPA’s clean air rules, they
firmly believe EPA should be allowed to do its job without interference from
Congress.”
SUPPORT EXTENDS ACROSS PARTY LINES
This poll found that support for the EPA air pollution rules
extends across the political spectrum. By three to one (75%) the public
believes that the EPA, not Congress, should determine whether stricter limits
are needed on air pollution from electric power plants. This is a view
supported by members of all parties, with 85% of Democrats, 62% of Republicans,
and 79% of Independents in agreement.
KEY REGIONAL FINDINGS
Across the country, voters support CSAPR, with 71% of voters
from the Northeast, 66% of voters in the South, 62% of voters in the Midwest,
and 71% of voters from the West in favor. Similarly, support for the
Mercury and Air Toxics Standards Rule is high nationwide: 80% of voters in the
Northeast, 75% of voters in the South, 72% of voters in the Midwest, and 83% of
voters in the West in support.
VOTERS RECOGNIZE THE BENEFITS
Voters see threats to water and health as the most important
reasons for enacting new EPA air pollution rules. In fact, 80% of voters
surveyed feel it is important to enact new rules because coal-burning power
plants contribute to water pollution via deposition of airborne pollutants that
eventually settle in our water bodies. 79% of voters agree that the rules
are important for health reasons, as power plant pollution is responsible for
more than 24,000 premature deaths, 38,000 non-fatal heart attacks, and more
than 550,000 asthma attacks each year.
These rules will save lives and, according to research
sponsored by Ceres on the economic impact of the rules, create 1.4 million new
jobs over the next five years through investments in pollution controls, new
plant construction, and retirement of older, less efficient power plants as the
country transitions to a cleaner, modernized generation fleet. Seventy-five
percent of those surveyed believe job creation from these rules is an important
reason to enact them.
That report, “New
Jobs-Cleaner Air: Employment Effects under Planned Changes to EPA’s Air
Pollution Rules,” found that installing modern pollution controls
and building new power plants creates a wide array of skilled, high-paying
installation, construction and professional jobs, as well as jobs at companies
that manufacture pollution controls and other required construction/maintenance
equipment. The report was prepared by Dr. James Heintz of the Political
Economy Research Institute at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
SURVEY METHODOLOGY
Hart Research Associates and GS Strategy Group conducted
this online nationwide survey, among 1,400 voters, between August 31-September
7, 2011. More details about the poll can be found
here.
ABOUT CERES
Ceres is a leading coalition of investors, environmental
groups and other public interest organizations working with companies to
address sustainability challenges such as global climate change. Ceres also
directs the Investor Network on Climate Risk (INCR), a network of 98 investors
with $9.5 trillion of collective assets focused on the business impacts of
climate change. www.ceres.org
ABOUT HART RESEARCH ASSOCIATES
Founded in 1971, Hart Research Associates is one of the
leading survey research firms in the United States and has been at the cutting
edge of change in the field of public opinion for more than three decades. In
that time, the firm has conducted well over 5,000 public opinion surveys and
has administered and analyzed interviews among more than three million
individuals.
ABOUT GS STRATEGY GROUP
GS Strategy Group is a nationally recognized public opinion
research firm based in Boise, ID. GSSG clients benefit from Greg Strimple's
unique combination of expertise in public opinion and consumer behavior,
award-winning work in advertising, and extensive knowledge of regulated
industries, the political process and public policymaking. Greg has leveraged
his research, analytical and communications skills to devise and execute
successful public policy and marketing campaigns for some of the country's
leading corporations and institutions.
No comments:
Post a Comment